Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 45.6 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1235 |
Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1220 |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | 1246 |
Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1233 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.