Model comparison

Magistral Small vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 3 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 22.9 to 6.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30% for Magistral Small and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.

Side by side

Magistral Small and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Magistral SmallTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.932.6
Released2025-06-102024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output40K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked1014

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
SciCode35.2%—
LMArena Coding—1236

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
ARC-AGI-15%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220
DTBench61.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19—

Math Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%4.4%
LMArena Math—1242
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond56.1%46.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English—1236
LMArena Chinese—1249
LMArena Russian—1246

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following—1233

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query—1224

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text—1256
LMArena Creative Writing—1231
LMArena Multi-Turn—1252

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Magistral Small or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper