Model comparison

Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.0

Rank #123 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 57.9 to 25.8.

Side by side

Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B specifications
Olmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.342.0
Released—2026-02-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked1028

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Coding10161410
LMArena WebDev—1254
SciCode—29.3%

Reasoning Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts9931400
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles—10%
DTBench—80%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.52

Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Math10181404
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70%

Knowledge Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
GPQA Diamond—83.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
LMArena Expert—1408

Multilingual Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English9771378
LMArena Chinese10141457
LMArena Russian9471376
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1367
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1356
LMArena Spanish—1392

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following9781379

Long Context Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query—1389

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Text10321395
LMArena Creative Writing9901346
LMArena Multi-Turn10071390

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper