Model comparison

Magistral Small vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.0

Rank #123 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 24.6 to 6.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30% for Magistral Small and 70% for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Magistral Small and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B specifications
Magistral SmallQwen3.5 35B-A3B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.242.0
Released2025-06-102026-02-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output40K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$2
Results tracked1028

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen3.5 35B-A3B
SciCode35.2%29.3%
LMArena WebDev—1254
LMArena Coding—1410

Reasoning Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen3.5 35B-A3B
CritPt0.3%0.6%
Chess Puzzles3%10%
DTBench61.3%80%
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19142.52
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
ARC-AGI-15%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1400
LMCA—29.5%

Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen3.5 35B-A3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%70%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56%
LMArena Math—1404

Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen3.5 35B-A3B
GPQA Diamond56.1%83.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
LMArena Expert—1408

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English—1378
LMArena Chinese—1457
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1367
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1356
LMArena Russian—1376
LMArena Spanish—1392

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following—1379

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query—1389

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Text—1395
LMArena Creative Writing—1346
LMArena Multi-Turn—1390

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

Is Magistral Small or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper