Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen-14B
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen-14B in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen-14B leads 27.5 to 24.0.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen-14B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1071 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Qwen-14B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Qwen-14B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | 1077 |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen-14B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1031 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Qwen-14B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen-14B?
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Qwen-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen-14B share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.