Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-7B
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 54.1 to 49.0.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-7B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1107 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1065 |
Math Qwen1.5-7B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1080 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-7B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | 1006 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-7B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1058 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-7B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.