Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
UpstageSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Solar Pro4 leads 48.7 to 41.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 42.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1399 |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | 1416 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | 1427 |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1290 | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | 1360 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Solar Pro4 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.