Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 49.1.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1319 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1302 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1316 |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1273 |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1408 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1275 |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.