Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Pixtral Large
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 32.9.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | — |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | — |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | — |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Pixtral Large?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.