Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Phi-4 Mini
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 38.6 to 28.1.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | — |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | — |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Phi-4 Mini?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.