Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Think vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 35.7.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 45.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1291 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1209 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1260 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1262 | 1471 |
| LMArena Russian | 1193 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1247 | 1440 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1272 | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1226 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1252 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.