Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Think vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 46.2 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1291 | 1016 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | 993 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1209 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1193 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1260 | — |
| LMArena German | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1247 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1272 | — |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1226 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1252 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.