Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 26.4 to 22.4.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 34.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.