Model comparison
Devstral Small 2505 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 26.4 to 19.7.
Side by side
| Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 34.3 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2025-05-07 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 56.4% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
Math Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Devstral Small 2505 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.9 vs 39.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.