Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Pixtral Large
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 32.9.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Pixtral Large?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.