Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs StarCoder 2 15B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#304); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 15B leads 36.6 to 28.6.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | StarCoder 2 15B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2024-02-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding StarCoder 2 15B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 37.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 105 |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 64.3% |
Math Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 57.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 47.2% |
| MMLU | — | 64.1% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than StarCoder 2 15B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#304); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?
StarCoder 2 15B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and StarCoder 2 15B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.