Model comparison
Claude Opus 5.5 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 91.8 to 23.1.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 68.6 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $20 | — |
| Results tracked | 44 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 54.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1813 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 62.3% | — |
| SciCode | 66.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1547 | — |
| MirrorCode | 77.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,147 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 73.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 30.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 9,235 | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 88.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 71.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1535 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 71% | — |
| DTBench | 98.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 68.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 167.33 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 95% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1506 | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 72.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1547 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1321 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 51.2% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 83.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1507 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1588 | — |
| LMArena French | 1514 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1520 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1507 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1537 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1532 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1515 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1533 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2050 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1499 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 5.5 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.