Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | — |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.93 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.