Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads 27.0 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B and 63.1% for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5.60 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1271 |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | 33% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1283 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | 63.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | 42.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| MMLU | — | 85.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena French | — | 1280 |
| LMArena German | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1256 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 73% | 80.6% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1254 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1282 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.9% | 80.2% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1221 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1272 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.