Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen Max
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Max leads 30.3 to 18.0.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 34.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312), Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1270 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270), Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Qwen Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1329 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Qwen Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243), Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1289 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226), Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen Max?
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen Max better for coding?
Qwen Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.