Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Magistral Medium leads 32.9 to 18.0.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
Magistral MediumOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index34.829.2
Released2025-03-172024-12-31
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked2212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOLMo 2 Furious 13B
SciCode39.2%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1319—

Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
CritPt0.3%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
LiveBench—22.1%

Math Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1249—

Knowledge Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOLMo 2 Furious 13B
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1222—

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1232—
LMArena Chinese1225—
LMArena French1268—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1176—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Russian1224—
LMArena Spanish1269—

Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1295—

Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1245—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Magistral Medium or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper