Model comparison
Magistral Medium vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Magistral Medium leads 32.9 to 18.0.
Side by side
| Magistral Medium | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-17 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1249 | — |
Knowledge Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | — |
| LMArena French | 1268 | — |
| LMArena German | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | — |
Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | — |
Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Medium better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Magistral Medium or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.