Model comparison

OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Phi-4

Phi-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 leads 32.6 to 18.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 16.3% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B and 47.8% for Phi-4.

Side by side

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi-4 specifications
OLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index29.731.2
Released2024-12-312024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi-4 leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
LiveBench Coding10.4%30.7%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LMArena Coding—1231
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Phi-4 leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
LiveBench Reasoning16.3%47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis20.6%45.2%
LiveBench22.1%41.6%
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42

Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
LiveBench Math13.6%42%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
Omni-MATH15.6%—
LMArena Math—1246
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Phi-4 leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
MMLU-Pro31%—
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
GPQA (HELM)31.6%—
LMArena Expert—1203
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
LMArena Non-English—1197
LMArena Chinese—1212
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Russian—1209
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Too close to call

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
LiveBench Instruction Following60.6%58.4%
IFEval73%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1201

Long Context Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query—1217

Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi-4
LiveBench Language11.2%25.6%
LMArena Text—1217
LMArena Creative Writing—1182
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
WildBench68.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1206

Frequently asked questions

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Phi-4?

Phi-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Phi-4 better for coding?

Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi-4 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper