Model comparison

Mistral vs Phi-4

Phi-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 2 categories and Phi-4 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 leads 32.6 to 16.6.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral and Phi-4 specifications
MistralPhi-4
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.931.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked2237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Mistral: 33.8 (#250), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralPhi-4
LMArena Coding11621231
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Mistral leads

Mistral: 22.2 (#200), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts11491220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Mistral leads

Mistral: 22.3 (#278), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralPhi-4
LMArena Math11801246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
Omni-MATH7.2%—
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Phi-4 leads

Mistral: 16.6 (#288), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralPhi-4
LMArena Expert11251203
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
MMLU-Pro27.7%—
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
GPQA (HELM)30.3%—
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Phi-4 leads

Mistral: 32.8 (#254), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralPhi-4
LMArena Non-English11291197
LMArena Chinese11091212
LMArena French11801224
LMArena German11551222
LMArena Japanese10131158
LMArena Korean10321151
LMArena Russian11681209
LMArena Spanish11431234

Instruction Following Phi-4 leads

Mistral: 52.6 (#288), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following11521201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%
IFEval56.8%—

Long Context Phi-4 leads

Mistral: 35.0 (#245), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query11531217

Writing & Preference Phi-4 leads

Mistral: 37.0 (#260), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralPhi-4
LMArena Text11651217
LMArena Creative Writing11581182
LMArena Multi-Turn11471206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
WildBench66%—
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral better than Phi-4?

Phi-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral or Phi-4 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (33.8 vs 34.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Mistral and Phi-4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper