Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs phi-3-medium 14B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 18.0 to 9.1.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math phi-3-medium 14B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than phi-3-medium 14B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.