Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Llama 2-13B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 43.0 to 30.0.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 2-13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 105.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Llama 2-13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1065 | — |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Llama 2-13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | — |
| LMArena French | 1043 | — |
| LMArena German | 1009 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1086 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1046 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1085 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Llama 2-13B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama 2-13B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.4 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.