Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.7 to 18.3.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.