Model comparison

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Yi-1.5-34B

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 19.5 to 14.8.

Side by side

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Olmo 2 0325 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)01.AI
Noometry Index32.730.6
Released—2024-05-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1621

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding12101169
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts12081160

Math Too close to call

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math12081182
Omni-MATH16.1%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond—32%
MMLU-Pro41.4%—
GPQA (HELM)28.7%—
LMArena Expert—1144

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English11601121
LMArena Chinese11921213
LMArena Russian11871091
LMArena French—1156
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005
LMArena Spanish—1121

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following11861139
IFEval78%—

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query11941143

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text12181173
LMArena Creative Writing11991135
LMArena Multi-Turn12211153
WildBench73.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper