Model comparison
Llama 3.1-405B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1-405B leads 30.4 to 19.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 72.3% for Llama 3.1-405B and 41.4% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2024-07-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 42 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1291 | 1210 |
| WeirdML | 21.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 7.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | 1208 |
| SimpleBench | 23% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 45% | — |
| DTBench | 61.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 82.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.75 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.9 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89.2% | — |
| PIQA | 85.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 89.2% | — |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 24.9% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 9.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 49.8% | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.1-405B leads
Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72.3% | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 52.2% | 28.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 50.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 17.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1243 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 95.3% | — |
| MMLU | 84.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 82.7% | — |
Multilingual Llama 3.1-405B leads
Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1248 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1265 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1279 | — |
| LMArena German | 1252 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1260 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1-405B leads
Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81.1% | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1259 | 1186 |
Long Context Llama 3.1-405B leads
Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1284 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1199 |
| WildBench | 78.3% | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1297 | 1221 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 870 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1-405B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.