Model comparison

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.5 Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 39.6 to 19.5.

Side by side

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Olmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)StepFun
Noometry Index32.742.3
Released—2026-01-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding12101436

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12081411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math12081408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%
Omni-MATH16.1%—

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
MMLU-Pro41.4%—
GPQA (HELM)28.7%—
LMArena Expert—1421

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English11601385
LMArena Chinese11921447
LMArena Russian11871385
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1354
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11861385
IFEval78%—

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query11941402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text12181403
LMArena Creative Writing11991357
LMArena Multi-Turn12211405
WildBench73.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper