Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.1 to 19.2.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1210 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1208 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1187 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.