Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen2-72B
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2-72B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 34.6 to 28.7.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 29.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222), Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —, Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174), Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.27 |
Math Qwen2-72B leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255), Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1235 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Qwen2-72B leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Qwen2-72B leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243), Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1240 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1169 |
| LMArena French | — | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1168 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238), Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1181 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1193 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231), Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1195 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen2-72B?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen2-72B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.