Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 35.5 to 19.5.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1299 |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1298 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1275 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1299 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.