Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.2 to 19.2.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 38.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174), Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255), Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.