Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#248); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 38.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#248); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.