Model comparison
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#250); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 32.9.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.0 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1130 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1127 | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1173 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1108 | — |
| LMArena French | 1110 | — |
| LMArena German | 1101 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 954 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1095 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1113 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1120 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1107 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#250); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.