Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Palm 2
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Palm 2 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 25.6.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 30.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 994 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1005 |
Math Palm 2 leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1049 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 887 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1010 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 994 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Palm 2?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Palm 2 better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.