Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs o3-mini

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 2 categories and o3-mini in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 26.0 to 16.3.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and o3-mini specifications
Granite 4.2 3bo3-mini
ProviderIBMOpenAI
Noometry Index39.436.7
Released—2024-12-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked1151

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo3-mini
LMArena Coding13611378
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
CadEval—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo3-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts13061366
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.34
ForecastBench—59.6
LiveBench—75.9%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo3-mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—76.9%
LiveBench Math—77.3%
LMArena Math—1396
MATH Level 5—96.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—12.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge o3-mini leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo3-mini
LMArena Expert13151364
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%

Multilingual o3-mini leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo3-mini
LMArena Non-English12681319
LMArena Chinese12691379
LMArena Russian12491304
LMArena French—1334
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo3-mini
LMArena Instruction Following12731337
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%

Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo3-mini
LMArena Longer Query12911343
Fiction.LiveBench—50%

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bo3-mini
LMArena Text12931337
LMArena Creative Writing12051286
LMArena Multi-Turn12901320
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than o3-mini?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or o3-mini better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.0 vs 40.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and o3-mini share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper