Model comparison

o1 vs Yi-1.5-34B

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. o1 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1 leads 41.5 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 94.7% for o1 and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1 and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
o1Yi-1.5-34B
ProviderOpenAI01.AI
Noometry Index40.930.6
Released2024-09-122024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked5221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

o1: 46.1 (#70), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding13671169
Aider Polyglot61.7%—
WeirdML47.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
LiveBench Coding69.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%
CadEval56%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+80.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1: 24.6 (#117), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons51.1%—

Reasoning o1 leads

o1: 27.9 (#111), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13711160
SimpleBench41.7%—
ARC-AGI-130.7%—
Chess Puzzles15%—
EnigmaEval5.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning91.6%—
DTBench74.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
LMCA22.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.91—
LiveBench75.7%—

Math o1 leads

o1: 36.1 (#175), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math13881182
MATH Level 594.7%25.5%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)14.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LiveBench Math80.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)9.3%—

Knowledge o1 leads

o1: 41.5 (#110), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond76.8%32%
LMArena Expert13611144
Humanity's Last Exam8%—
SimpleQA Verified41.1%—
Confabulations11.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

o1: 34.2 (#93), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1168—
GeoBench80%—
VPCT37%—
SpatialViz-Bench41.4%—

Multilingual o1 leads

o1: 48.6 (#142), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English13581121
LMArena Chinese13941213
LMArena French13441156
LMArena German13371111
LMArena Japanese13461021
LMArena Korean13961005
LMArena Russian13561091
LMArena Spanish13451121

Instruction Following o1 leads

o1: 74.8 (#86), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following13671139
LiveBench Instruction Following81.5%—

Long Context o1 leads

o1: 50.3 (#9), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query13781143
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—

Writing & Preference o1 leads

o1: 55.6 (#144), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text13661173
LMArena Creative Writing13481135
LMArena Multi-Turn13691153
Short-Story Creative Writing70.2%—
LiveBench Language65.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1 better than Yi-1.5-34B?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1 and Yi-1.5-34B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper