Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Yi-1.5-34B

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-3 mini leads 46.4 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 90.9% for Grok-3 mini and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Grok-3 miniYi-1.5-34B
ProviderxAI01.AI
Noometry Index41.230.6
Released2025-04-092024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3521

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding13791169
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
WeirdML42.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13751160
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math13861182
MATH Level 590.9%25.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH31.8%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond76.3%32%
LMArena Expert13951144
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English13521121
LMArena Chinese13871213
LMArena French13571156
LMArena German13491111
LMArena Japanese13421021
LMArena Korean13351005
LMArena Russian13531091
LMArena Spanish13811121

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following13571139
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query13721143
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text13701173
LMArena Creative Writing13421135
LMArena Multi-Turn13551153
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Yi-1.5-34B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper