Model comparison

o1 vs Step 3

o1 and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.6 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

o1 OpenAI

40.6

Rank #140 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

39.9

Rank #145 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. o1 scores higher in 6 categories and Step 3 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 40.3.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1 and Step 3 specifications
o1Step 3
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index40.639.9
Released2024-09-12—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked5217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

o1: 45.7 (#64), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
LMArena Coding13671367
Aider Polyglot61.7%—
WeirdML47.6%—
LiveBench Coding69.7%—
CadEval56%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+80.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1: 24.3 (#111), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons51.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

o1: 27.5 (#103), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
LMArena Hard Prompts13721355
SimpleBench41.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
ARC-AGI-130.7%—
Chess Puzzles15%—
EnigmaEval5.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning91.6%—
DTBench74.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
LMCA22.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.92—
LiveBench75.7%—

Math Too close to call

o1: 34.9 (#150), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
LMArena Math13881366
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)14.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LiveBench Math80.3%—
MATH Level 594.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)9.3%—

Knowledge o1 leads

o1: 41.5 (#101), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
LMArena Expert13621333
GPQA Diamond76.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8%—
SimpleQA Verified41.1%—
Confabulations11.7%—

Multimodal Step 3 leads

o1: 33.6 (#87), Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
LMArena Vision11681176
GeoBench80%—
VPCT37%—
SpatialViz-Bench41.4%—

Multilingual o1 leads

o1: 48.8 (#137), Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
LMArena Non-English13591327
LMArena Chinese13941396
LMArena German13371371
LMArena Korean13961271
LMArena Russian13561331
LMArena Spanish13451372
LMArena French1343—
LMArena Japanese1346—

Instruction Following o1 leads

o1: 75.0 (#82), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following13681332
LiveBench Instruction Following81.5%—

Long Context o1 leads

o1: 50.3 (#9), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
LMArena Longer Query13781326
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—

Writing & Preference o1 leads

o1: 55.8 (#139), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1Step 3
LMArena Text13661351
LMArena Creative Writing13471322
LMArena Multi-Turn13681340
Short-Story Creative Writing70.2%—
LiveBench Language65.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1 better than Step 3?

o1 and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.6 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is o1 or Step 3 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1 and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper