Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Step 3

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 40.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 5 categories and Step 3 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 54.3.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3 specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
ProviderTencentStepFun
Noometry Index41.340.5
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Coding13611367

Reasoning Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Hard Prompts13741355
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Math13591366

Knowledge Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Expert13391333

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Vision—1177

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Non-English13631327
LMArena Chinese14171397
LMArena German13551371
LMArena Korean13511269
LMArena Russian13681331
LMArena French1391—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Spanish—1371

Instruction Following Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following13441332

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Longer Query13661326

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3
LMArena Text13771350
LMArena Creative Writing13591321
LMArena Multi-Turn13871341

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Step 3?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 40.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Step 3 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.0 vs 40.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper