Model comparison

o1-pro vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

o1-pro OpenAI

31.5

Rank #271 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 37.0 to 29.7.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper at $1.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-pro and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
o1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.538.1
Released2025-03-192025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K262K
Max output100K66K
Input $ / M tokens$150$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$600$7.50
Results tracked325

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
LMArena Coding—1412
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
ARC-AGI-123.3%—
EnigmaEval6.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372

Math Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math—1365

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
LMArena Expert—1338

Multilingual Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1346
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena French—1398
LMArena German—1325
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Korean—1305
LMArena Russian—1366
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1355

Long Context Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1378

Writing & Preference Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1357
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-pro better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper