Model comparison

o1-mini vs Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 21.6 to 8.8.
  • Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-mini and Step 3.7 Flash specifications
o1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index34.037.3
Released2024-09-122026-05-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.18
Output $ / M tokens—$1.11
Results tracked395

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads

o1-mini: 35.5 (#224), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
SciCode—40%
WeirdML36.3%—
LiveBench Coding48%—
LMArena Coding1362—
ALE-Bench—694.12
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1-mini: 24.6 (#118), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
Cybench10%—

Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads

o1-mini: 8.8 (#346), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—39.7%
ARC-AGI-114%—
CritPt—2.3%
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1333—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82—
LiveBench57.8%—

Math Step 3.7 Flash leads

o1-mini: 35.4 (#186), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%—
LiveBench Math62%—
LMArena Math1358—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

o1-mini: 34.9 (#192), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond62.4%—
Confabulations18.6%—
LMArena Expert1316—

Multilingual Not comparable

o1-mini: 43.6 (#182), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1289—
LMArena Chinese1314—
LMArena French1293—
LMArena German1278—
LMArena Japanese1245—
LMArena Korean1223—
LMArena Russian1283—
LMArena Spanish1303—

Instruction Following Not comparable

o1-mini: 66.7 (#206), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1304—

Long Context Not comparable

o1-mini: 40.1 (#161), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1320—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

o1-mini: 48.4 (#202), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1317—
LMArena Creative Writing1244—
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1314—
LiveBench Language40.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1-mini or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper