Noometry

Model comparison

o1-mini vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 8.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 46.9% for o1-mini and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

o1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.045.3
Released2024-09-122026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked3932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 35.5 (#224), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding13621473
FrontierCode—10.2%
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML36.3%—
LiveBench Coding48%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 24.6 (#118), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
Cybench10%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 8.8 (#346), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts13331460
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82147.37
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-114%—
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA—37.6%
LiveBench57.8%—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 35.4 (#186), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%93.3%
LMArena Math13581466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
LiveBench Math62%—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 34.9 (#192), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond62.4%87.9%
LMArena Expert13161467
Confabulations18.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

o1-mini: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 43.6 (#182), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English12891445
LMArena Chinese13141510
LMArena French12931473
LMArena German12781471
LMArena Japanese12451413
LMArena Korean12231415
LMArena Russian12831457
LMArena Spanish13031457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 66.7 (#206), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following13041440
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 40.1 (#161), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query13201455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 48.4 (#202), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text13171455
LMArena Creative Writing12441439
LMArena Multi-Turn13141460
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
LiveBench Language40.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1-mini or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper