Model comparison
o1-mini vs Palm 2
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 6 categories and Palm 2 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1-mini leads 48.6 to 25.7.
Side by side
| o1-mini | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 29.4 |
| Released | 2024-09-12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 39 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 35.1 (#218), Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1362 | 995 |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 36.3% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 89% | — |
| MBPP+ | 78.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1-mini: 24.3 (#112), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
Reasoning Palm 2 leads
o1-mini: 8.9 (#340), Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1005 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 18.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 14% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 72.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.82 | — |
| LiveBench | 57.8% | — |
Math o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 33.7 (#168), Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1358 | 1049 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 46.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 62% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 89.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
o1-mini: 34.8 (#180), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 62.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | — |
Multilingual o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 43.8 (#177), Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1289 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1292 | — |
| LMArena German | 1278 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1223 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1302 | — |
Instruction Following o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 67.0 (#200), Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1304 | 1010 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 65.4% | — |
Long Context o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 40.1 (#156), Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference o1-mini leads
o1-mini: 48.6 (#196), Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)
| Benchmark | o1-mini | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1317 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 994 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 64.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 40.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-mini better than Palm 2?
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is o1-mini or Palm 2 better for coding?
o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.