Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs o1-mini
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1-mini leads 48.4 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 34.0 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1-mini leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1362 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | 78.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1333 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 135.82 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math o1-mini leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge o1-mini leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual o1-mini leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1293 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1283 |
| LMArena German | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1303 |
Instruction Following o1-mini leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context o1-mini leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1320 |
Writing & Preference o1-mini leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than o1-mini?
o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or o1-mini better for coding?
o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and o1-mini share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.