Model comparison
Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 35.8.
- Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper at $0.60 / $3.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 42.2 |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 10K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12.50 | $3.60 |
| Results tracked | 6 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 27B leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 44.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |
Math Qwen3.6 27B leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 35% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 51.8% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.6 27B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.