Model comparison
Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 33.8.
- Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
Side by side
| Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 10K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12.50 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 6 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 44.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 35% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 51.8% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.3% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.