Model comparison

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B Alibaba (Qwen)

46.0

Rank #67 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 34.5 to 22.4.
  • Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B specifications
Nova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.446.0
Released2025-12-022026-02-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$3.60
Results tracked336

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 42.0 (#114)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena WebDev—1400
SciCode42.7%—
LMArena Coding—1465

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.3 (#53)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
APEX-Agents—24.9%
τ²-bench Airline—81.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—84.4%
τ²-bench Telecom—97.8%
GDP.pdf2%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 34.5 (#70)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—58.9%
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles—13%
Thematic Generalization—65.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1448
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.65

Math Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 46.1 (#73)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—31.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
LMArena Math—1454

Knowledge Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#58)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
GPQA Diamond—86.4%
LMArena Expert—1462

Multimodal Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.7 (#44)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Vision—1263

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.7 (#59)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Non-English—1430
LMArena Chinese—1500
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1447
LMArena Japanese—1426
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Russian—1429
LMArena Spanish—1441

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.0 (#77)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Instruction Following—1424

Long Context Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#74)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Longer Query—1442

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.3 (#79)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Text—1438
LMArena Creative Writing—1401
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1478
LMArena Multi-Turn—1446

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.0 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper