Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 22.4.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 30K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | — |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.